
To be fair to Jerry,
he’s put his time and his energy and his money where his mouth is. He’s studied
the issues, read widely, sought out the silenced and listened to their stories.
He has a right to his passion.
Given how much Jerry
cares, you might think he would actively seek out conversation with those who
weren’t yet on the same page. You might think that he would look for
opportunities to persuade, to teach, to open someone’s foolishly closed mind.
But Jerry’s tired of
all that. Fair enough. It’s Jerry’s wall.
David Brooks, in a recent
New York Times editorial (11/13/17), says that Jerry, like a whole lot of us,
is held in the grip of a siege mentality where the culture is seen as
irredeemably hostile to one’s deepest held convictions. Everyone else is wrong.
It’s us against the world.
Useful, Brooks admits, as
a way to motivate people to get with the team, but in the end,
self-destructive. “Groups smitten with the siege mentality filter out
discordant facts and become more extreme versions of themselves…displacing
whatever creed they started with.” Including servant leadership, Brooks says. Including,
I would add, any kind of a Sermon on the Mount Christian ethos of humility,
righteousness, mercy, and compassion.
And the ironic piece of
all this is that the social media that the culture at large and the church,
too, have wholeheartedly embraced, Facebook, Twitter and the like, tools
designed ostensibly to increase communication, facilitate far-flung
conversations, and, in the church’s case, to proclaim gospel truth to those who
might otherwise never hear it, make it so easy to be viciously partisan, to dig
in to our bubbles and filter out discordant facts and uncomfortable people. Disagree
with Jerry—and you’re gone.
Two Jews, an Amishman,
and an atheist walk into a bar.
Sounds like the
beginning of a bad Henny Youngman joke.

And they talked.
About religion and the
Bible and the end times and why Amish people drive buggies and don’t drink beer.
About secular Jews and what they believe and don’t believe and why atheists and
conservative Christians can’t seem to get along. About good coffee and bad college
and horse ranching in Montana. About the possibility or not that the Amish guy
and his family could build a house in three weeks like they planned. (That conversation
included a phone-in with the atheist biker dude’s African-American carpenter
buddy in Chicago.)
We can do this, too, you
know. Maybe it takes being locked in a
confined space for three days with no internet, no cable, no decent food, and nothing to do but
look out the window. But we can do this. We can talk to each and more
importantly we can listen. We can sit down with people face to face, people who
are visibly different than we are. We can listen to their stories.
Will it challenge us? Will it be deeply
uncomfortable? Will we agree with
everything we hear—or anything? Yes, yes, and no, most likely.
But we can do this. If
two guys wearing corn cob costumes can do it, surely we can, too, we who claim
to follow a savior who went to the far country to hang out with outcasts and
oddballs and people no one else wanted to bother with. We can seek out the
other, the stranger, the alien, the one who we disagree with completely, and we can talk.
We can listen like it’s our job.
Because we might learn
something. Because we might share something worthwhile. Because we might grow
as human beings, as neighbors, as persons of faith. Because it’s what Jesus
asked us to do.
Two Jews, an Amishman,
and an atheist walked into a bar. And they walked out friends.
What a concept.